Sneak Peek of My New Book
Posted on | March 13, 2010 | No Comments
Anderson Cooper Uncovers Auto Insurance Shady Practices
Posted on | March 8, 2010 | No Comments
In this three-party series, CNN’s Anderson Cooper covers the issues that victims of car accidents have to deal with when making a claim. It’s very important that you watch all three parts.
Defective Tires and Tire Failure: Tread Separation
Posted on | February 22, 2010 | No Comments
- Tread separation
- Tire failure
- Tire blowout
- Tire or rim explosion
Since 2000, there are have been several major recalls of millions of tires. For instance, in the early 2000s, there were massive recalls of more than 15 million tires of several types of Bridgestone and Firestone tires (Bridgestone owns Firestone), especially those put on the Ford Explorer SUV, which resulted in a number of crashes, especially rollovers, killing and seriously injuring hundreds of motorists. For example, Firestone’s Wilderness AT tire lacked proper adhesion between the steel belts and the surrounding rubber. Firestone failed to use gum edge strips, nylon overlays or caps, or other safeguards to reduce the possibility of tread separation.
Causes of traffic injuries and deaths due to faulty tires include:
Tread separationTire failureTire blowoutTire or rim explosion
Domestic and foreign manufacturers alike have made and marketed defective tires that have resulted in crashes, personal injuries, and wrongful deaths. However, tires made overseas (such as in China) may not be as safe as those made in the United States. Tires are not designed to last forever, even though you may drive only a few thousand of miles each year. Rubber degrades over time, and mechanics recommend that you put on new tires every five or six years even though there may be plenty of tread left on the tire.
When a tire is made, the base part of the tire is built first and then through various chemical and heating processes, steel belts are imbedded in the tire, and finally the tread is applied. Steel-belted radial tires are especially prone to tread separation. When the tread separates the driver may lose control of the vehicle, even when the tire does not lose pressure. Tread separation is usually due to some problem in the manufacturing process. The tire may be designed defectively or constructive carelessly. The manufacturer may use rubber that is too old and dry, miss warning signs during final inspection, use petroleum solvent before vulcanization, and cure moisture into the tire. Although tread separation usually occurs with a tire several years old being driven at a fairly fast speed, there have also been cases of brand new tires separating while being driven at slower speeds, such as 15 or 20 mph. Of course, the faster you are driving when you experience a tire failure due to tread separation or blowout, the more likely the chances that you will be seriously hurt or even killed.
When a radial tire loses its tread, the body (“carcass”) of the tire usually quickly experiences a blowout. The sudden loss of pressure in the tire makes it difficult for the driver to maintain control over the vehicle, and the vehicle may turn sideways. The sideways motion of the vehicle causes the bead of the tire to separate from the rim, causing the metal rim to dig into the asphalt or concrete surface of the roadway and pitch the car into a roll.
A report from the National Highway Safety Administration revealed that tread separations reduced the ability of drivers to control their vehicles, especially when the tire failure occurs on a rear tire at a high speed. The report also found that there is a much higher likelihood for death, injury, and crashes when the tread separation occurs on a SUV than on a pickup truck.
Underinflation of the tires can be a contributing factor in tread separation. Therefore, it is up to the car’s owner to see that the air pressure in the tires meets the manufacturer’s standards, which are normally found on the doorjamb of the driver’s door. Underinflation can occur by air escaping through the rubber, or leaks at interfaces of the tire with the wheel and valve stem.
You can avoid some tire failures by simply visually inspecting your tires once a month. Things to look for include cracking or cuts in the sidewalls; uneven treat wear; excessively worn tread; bulges or blisters; and excessive vibration while driving. An inexpensive tire-gauge can be purchased at your local auto store, and used every month to ensure that your pressure is within the manufacturer’s recommendation. Be sure to measure tire pressure when the tires are cold. Tires are considered cold if they have not been driven in the preceding three hours.
Also, underinflation of a tire means that the sidewall flexes more, making it more difficult to control the vehicle. A sidewall that flexes too much can also cause heat to build up excessively, which can shorten a tire’s life and possibly lead to a tread separation or blowout. Another incentive to and advantage of keeping your tire pressure at the manufacturer’s recommendations is that you will get optimal fuel mileage if you fill your tires to the manufacturer’s specifications.
Because a tire is a product, the law of strict products liability applies to cases involving injuries or deaths caused by a tire failure. It is not necessary to prove any specific act of carelessness (“negligence”) on the part of the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer. You need prove only that the tire was defective and that defect caused or contributed to your injuries or your loved one’s death.
Autonomic Dysreflexia
Posted on | February 17, 2010 | No Comments
Autonomic dysreflexia (AD), also called hyperreflexia, can occur in persons who have suffered a spinal cord injury at or above the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5). AD means an over-activity of the Autonomic Nervous System. AD occurs when there is an irritation, pain, or stimulus to the nervous system below the level of injury. The irritated area sends a signal to the brain, but because of the injury to the spinal cord, the signal is not able to reach the brain. A reflex action takes place, tightening blood vessels, causing the blood pressure to rise to dangerously high levels. If the blood pressure is not controlled, it may cause a stroke, seizure, or even death.
Common signs or symptoms of AD are:
- Seeing spots or blurred vision
- Pounding headache
- Nasal congestion
- Flushed face
- Red blotching on the neck and chest
- Profuse sweating above the level of injury
- Goose bumps
- Cool, clammy skin
- Nausea
- Anxiety or a feeling of doom
AD is a serious condition that requires immediate medical attention. Spinal Cord Injury patients, caregivers, and medical professionals must be knowledgeable about AD and its management.
Victory for people of Illinois – Damages Caps Unconstitutional
Posted on | February 4, 2010 | No Comments
The Illinois Supreme Court ruled today (4-2) that a 2005 law that set non-economic damages caps on plaintiff’s awards in medical malpractice lawsuits is unconstitutional. The reversal of the arbitrary caps is a victory for consumers in Illinois.
Damages caps are arbitrary and inherently unfair. The law basically said, that no matter what your injury, no matter how egregious the medical error, no matter how preventable it was, you are limited as to the award you should get. There was no formula, no science and no logic behind the numbers they chose.
Currently, in California, there is a non-economic cap on damages a plaintiff can receive in a medical malpractice suit. It is capped at $250,000.00 and represents an arbitrary number that was chosen back in the 80’s.
Have you been involved in an accident?
Posted on | January 23, 2010 | No Comments
If you or a loved one have been involved in an accident call now and speak to a lawyer for free about your case. Don’t let an insurance company or defense attorney take advantage of you. Read our personal injury guide for more information about the things you need to know.
Tags: attorneys > lawyers > personal injury > personal injury lawyers
Medical Helicopter Crash Investigation: “Was Preventable”
Posted on | November 28, 2009 | No Comments
The Washington Post reported today, that a preliminary investigation into the November 14, 2009 Medical Helicopter Crash earlier this month which left three crew members dead was preventable. The report states that safety equipment that has been recommended by federal experts for years had not been installed in the helicopter which was owned and operated by Mountain LifeFlight in California. Medical helicopter crashes have resulted in more than 30 deaths in the last two years alone. The Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board have maintained their positions on safety recommendation and industry standards, however, the requirements for commercial flights and private flights remain different.
For more information on aviation accidents or helicopter accidents, visit the aviation law center.
Tags: heli accident > helicopter accident > helicopter crash > lifeflight accident > lifeflight crash > med crash > medical helicopter accident
Toyota Major Recall; Replace more than 4 Million Gas Pedals
Posted on | November 25, 2009 | No Comments
Toyota announced this morning that they will be recalling and replacing more than 4 million gas pedals in the United States. The recall was prompted by several major accidents involving the accelerators getting stuck in the floor mats.
The recall includes the following Toyota Models:
- 2007-10 Toyota Camry
- 2005-10 Toyota Avalon
- 2004-09 Prius
- 2005-10 Toyota Tacoma
- 2007-10 Toyota Tundra
- 2007-10 Lexus ES350
- 2006-10 Lexus IS250/350.
In August of this year, a fatal accident involving a California Highway Patrol officer and his family prompted an immediate investigation into the possibilities of a defective gas pedal in Toyota cars. This particular crash involved a 2009 Lexus ES350 where the accelerator was stuck. The car couldn’t be stopped and reached speed of 120mph just before striking an embankment, rolling over and bursting into flames.
Defective Products and Product Liability
The basic laws of product liability and consumer safety include the protection of the public from a manufacturer or supplier that produces a product that can injure someone. While the theory’s of product liability and dangerous product protection can involve determining the type of defect and proving it; a strict liability for dangerous product manufacturing and supplying may also apply. Such strict liability may apply to a commercial supplier or manufacturer if the defect makes the product unreasonably dangerous. To learn more about product liability, visit our dangerous product information center.
Tags: dangerous product > product liability > product recall > toyota > toyota recall
Victory for Consumers in California
Posted on | November 25, 2009 | No Comments
On Monday, the California Court of Appeals in San Diego ruled unanimously that defendants must take full responsibility for medical costs a plaintiff incurred as a result of a defendants wrongdoing. The case, Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., is a great victory for consumers. Previous holdings stated that if a plaintiff was injured in an accident caused by a defendant, and the plaintiff had their own private health insurance which they paid for, the amount that a defendant is found to be responsible for can be reduced by the amount already paid by the plaintiff’s own health insurance. Thus, leaving the plaintiff with nothing.
Collateral Source Rule
Posted on | November 25, 2009 | 1 Comment
In personal injury cases, the Collateral Source Rule is intended to help promote full justice and compensation from a defendants wrongdoing. The rule basically does not allow for an award to be reduced by a judge or jury just because the plaintiff received benefits from other sources, such as health insurance. The rationale behind the collateral source rule is that a defendant should not benefit from the plaintiff’s investment in private health insurance. In some states, the collateral source rule prohibits the admission of evidence that would inform the jury that the plaintiff has been compensated by a different source other than the defendant (i.e. health insurance).
Tags: collateral > collateral source > collateral source rule
Recently Written
- Sneak Peek of My New Book
- Anderson Cooper Uncovers Auto Insurance Shady Practices
- Defective Tires and Tire Failure: Tread Separation
- Autonomic Dysreflexia
- Victory for people of Illinois – Damages Caps Unconstitutional
- Have you been involved in an accident?
- Medical Helicopter Crash Investigation: “Was Preventable”
- Toyota Major Recall; Replace more than 4 Million Gas Pedals
- Victory for Consumers in California
- Collateral Source Rule
Categories
- Aviation Law
- Bus Accident
- Car Accident
- Consumer Rights
- FAQ's
- Helicopter Accidents
- Insurance
- Latest News
- Legal Dictionary
- Legislation
- Motorcycle Safety
- Pedestrian Accidents
- Recall & Safety
- Subrogation
- Trial News
- Truck Accidents
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008